Should We Do Game Reviews?
#1
21 November 2012 - 11:48 PM
This question is mostly aimed towards Arch, since he's idling in chat right now and not responding, but chime in if you have an opinion.
#2
22 November 2012 - 05:25 AM
Stann, on 21 November 2012 - 11:48 PM, said:
This question is mostly aimed towards Arch, since he's idling in chat right now and not responding, but chime in if you have an opinion.
I don't think this would be such a bad idea honestly. I approve!
#3
22 November 2012 - 08:59 AM
#6
23 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
Arch, would it be possible to make it so that reviewers could submit an article, then have it send a notification to anyone flagged as a reviews editor so they could proof-read it before it would go public? If it could be done, it would save a lot of time and smooth out the process of getting them up. If it's too much work though, I'd understand.
#7
23 November 2012 - 01:51 AM
#8
23 November 2012 - 02:19 AM
kyozo22, on 23 November 2012 - 01:51 AM, said:
I definitely like that idea -- especially the moddable part.
#9
23 November 2012 - 02:58 AM
Gameplay
Presentation
Controls
Challenge Level
Moddable sounds like an interesting one too. I'm definitely not going to be scoring games though, game scores come with a whole lot of unnecessary baggage.
#10
23 November 2012 - 03:04 AM
Stann, on 23 November 2012 - 02:58 AM, said:
See this for an example.
Edit: Nevermind; wrong kind of baggage.
This post has been edited by Advent: 23 November 2012 - 03:10 AM
#11
23 November 2012 - 03:12 AM
Well, actually, what the score says is that it's on average with 50% of games.
#12
23 November 2012 - 03:18 AM
Stann, on 23 November 2012 - 03:12 AM, said:
Well, actually, what the score says is that it's on average with 50% of games.
To be fair, that's not what I read when I see a 5/10; I do read that someone didn't have a very high opinion of the game. I don't think most, if any, review a game like that; or if they do, I haven't seen any.
#13
23 November 2012 - 03:24 AM
Advent, on 23 November 2012 - 03:18 AM, said:
Exactly my point. Almost all game scores on a scale of 1 to 10 really could be converted to a scale of -5 to 5. Scores have become so inflated for whatever reasons that if a game gets less than a 7, fans lose it.
#14
23 November 2012 - 05:37 AM
Stann, on 23 November 2012 - 03:24 AM, said:
Oh, that's what you meant. Well, I suppose. I guess it could be up to the reviewer.
#16
23 November 2012 - 01:08 PM
#17
23 November 2012 - 06:28 PM
#18
23 November 2012 - 07:09 PM
Harbringer, on 23 November 2012 - 06:28 PM, said:
Yeah I think that goes without saying for the most part. I know that if I personally was gonna do a review, it'd be my own criteria.
#19
23 November 2012 - 08:43 PM
Harbringer, on 23 November 2012 - 06:28 PM, said:
I was strictly speaking of how I would write one, not dictate to other reviewers how they should write it.
#20
24 November 2012 - 01:08 PM
Stann, on 23 November 2012 - 03:24 AM, said:
Yeah, 7 is the new 5. I agree with keeping numbers out of it entirely, but I do think there should be some kind of unifying formal structure for the sake of continuity.